In past generations, equal rights were not afforded to all people equally. Native Americans were deemed unworthy to live on the land of their ancestors. African Americans have been treated as the equivalent of farm equipment. Women have been the subordinate of their male counterparts, viewed as less capable in every way. To an extent, these groups were treated as we would treat an animal. What is the next logical step in our social evolution? Could it be that animals deserve rights equal to that of humans? We take their land, and their homes, as our own population spreads. Do we deserve it more? We buy them and sell them. We keep them in miserable conditions on crowded and unsanitary farms. At a certain age we line them up for slaughter. Is this acceptable? We force them to entertain us by making them race or fight. We imprison and enslave them in a zoo, circus, or even our homes. Is that fair? What gives humans the right?
For more info, go to:
http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=8
Our responses:
Allison: Animals should have just as many rights as humans do. This planet was made for animals, but humans just took it over and developed all the land. Think about how pissed animals should be at us. We take their homes and kill their families just so our greedy butts can eat meat! There are so many more options for food but people decide to murder instead. What kind of jerks are we?!
Castor: We take animals away from their homes to put them in a cage
for our amusement. Its wrong to do that to them because you would not want someone to do that to you. There is a reason that they are somewhere else than we are. Animals should be left alone in the places that they have been for years because if we were meant to be living together they would already be here.
Josh: I believe in the survival of the fittest. We need to eat
animals because they are the most reliable source of food we have. Crops take more space, and do not adapt to new environments the way livestock do. Conditions on farms or in slaughterhouses may not be ideal, but the animals we eat would have a much more painful and gruesome death if they were eaten by a natural predator in the wild. Even a bullet from a hunter is a better way to go than to be ripped to shreds by something higher up the food chain. My family hunts deer in Wisconsin both for the food and to keep their population in control. They eat crops meant for people and run in front of cars, they are a menace.
As far as using animals for entertainment or testing, I believe they already have rights. Those things are regulated and there are people that make sure things don't go too far. I am no expert but I would bet the United States treats its animals better than most of the world. If we had no testing here they would do it somewhere else where people have other things to worry about than a few monkeys or rats. Living in a democratic country means we have to listen to people on both sides of every issue, even the extreme sides of the argument, and meet somewhere in the middle. Our country does as good a job of that as anyone could ask for, including the issue of animal rights.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I can see both ways, I dont believe in animals, sucha as tigers and elepahnts kept in cages for public entertainment, they need to be in their own enviornment out in the wild. Now with dogs and cats, they are kept in our houses for company they are a 'mans best friend'
ReplyDeleteI never really thought about animal rights. yea i treat my dog like a human but if i think about it we do treat animals like slaves. Im not sure if animals should have the exact same rights as humans but animals need to have some rights.
ReplyDeleteI think animals should have the same rights as humans. They deserve to live in a nice home with a comfortable bed like humans do. They don't deserve to be outside in the heat or cold and rain or snow. Yes, some people treat their dogs a little over the top like Paris Hilton, but, atleast it's getting taken care of and not beaten. My cat and dog get to sleep on pillows and blankets just like I do. They aren't treated any differently in my house.
ReplyDeleteI do understand all the rights animals have as living beings. Yes we do make them entertain us and there are some of us that abuse or torture them, but we as humans were given the right of free will. We are the only animal on this planet that has the direct right to choose whether we live or die, whether we kill or be killed, and take pleasure in natural experiences. We as humans have the right to decide to listen to our natural insticts, or go against them and become not animals, but monsters. We develope ways to torture and kill other humans. We take control of everything because we have the free will to do so. It is natural as humans and as animals to kill and eat others. So kill and eating other animals is clearly natural as omnivorous beings. But animals, forced to do what we say, are taken advantage of by what we humans do best. We interact with our environment by building technology and taiming those who would do harm to us. It is true we have made bad choices, such as slavery, but only natural because we have free will. To our free will, I feel the question is not the rights of animals, but the free will of humans, and how far can we really go? We take great advantage of our free will, because it is human nature. Much as it is animal nature to be killed, to be hunted, and to be taken advantage of. Individually, we as humans must decide what "rights" animals should have. As man, we believe we have first take at everything. As animals, we react and protect ourselves. As being gifted of free will, me decide what really happens in this world.
ReplyDeleteHmmm. Again, my problem is one of word choice. How would we define "rights"? Never mind that, how would we even define "animal rights"?
ReplyDeleteI believe that God created animals as a source of food, and gave them to us to rule over. (Genesis Genesis1:28, Gen.9:3) I don't think it is ok to be cruel to animals needlessly, but God gave them to us to eat. If people are mistreating animals in circuses, i believe that is wrong, because while we are supposed to rule over them, we dod not need to treat them badly if we can help it.
ReplyDeleteJust because animals were put on the earth, just as us humans, I don't see why we should grant them human rights. Many animals are dangerous and are considered a threat to humans who are uneducated about them. It seems so natural that animals are considered "just animals" and not treated as humans. I agree with Josh on the idea of survival of the fittest. I don't think its right for people to treat animals in a hurtful way such as dog fights, dog racing, etc., but its inevitable. Even though there are rules, someone is always there to break them. Animals brains are no where close to being as complex as our own, I don't think that it really effects the animals in such a way that we should be concerned with granting them human rights. I also agree with Josh on the fact that since we live in a democratic country, that means that we have to come to a consensus on most issues. We can't please everyone, its impossible.
ReplyDeleteMichelle King
I believe that animals do not need the same rights as people. Humans are the dominant species on the planet. We eat them to stay alive. As for the entertainment purposes, some of the animals in the zoo would not have survived in the wild. By keeping them in the zoo we are helping to preserve their life and helping them to repopulate. Pets are treated better in this country than some children in other countries. They are put through sweatshops and other conditions that are just terrible.
ReplyDelete-Danielle L.
Wild animals need to be in a wild environment for sure, it's part of the beauty and grace of our planet. But severe animal rights? C'mon. Have you as pet owners who want to give animals a comfortable life realize that at one point thses animals were wild creatures? They've evolved to fit our selfish needs as humans. Dogs decended from wild wolves and cats decended from wild cats. Did we then by domesticasting these animals for our own pleasure take away their rights as wild preditors and beings?
ReplyDeleteBecause that is their natural nature is to be a preditor remember the cat-and-mouse? Did anyone learn about the heirarchy of animal feeding? Are we not at the top of the food chain? Don't we need food to survive? This practice has been around for tens of thousands of years. Domesticating and giving animals "rights" takes away from their natural existance and sense of survival.
Animals should have right but not equal rights. Ringts meaning - power or equality. We can't travel through the desert without without water and a camel on our back with their supply but the camel can do the opposite. Animals are here for us to eat and survive Animals are food just like plants. Animal have enough rights to send humans to prison for example: Mitchael Vick. Animals and humans can't be equal.
ReplyDeletei dont see any resaon any animals should get the rights we do because most animals are a threat to society thats why they keep them in the zoo or caged away so they cant destruct anything. We eat animals parts of their bodies are in our freezer right now and all of the animals that are in our freezer or frigg right now had to be killed so that tells you that some people dont care for animals. On the other hand animals can be a real help to the unfortunate like the blind and the disabled. slaughtering of these animals is wrong i think because it is like killing a human but we need that animal to keep us from suffering starvation starvation. Some of the animals we have are used for entertainment and most animals are used for protection. If they are for entertainmnet then it isnt fair to the animal by taken advantage of the animal no matter what kind of animal it is.
ReplyDeleteAs far as using cows, pigs, and chickens for their meat i have no objections. They are bred and raised by humans to be eaten by humans. however, i think it is unecessary and wrong to go out hunting and poaching. Those animals were bred out in the wild to live out in the wild.
ReplyDelete- Michael Kahler -
Mhm, this is a subject I really never paid much attention to, probably because I don't really care about 'animal rights'. Now don't get the wrong impression I am not a hunter, poacher, animal torturer or whatever else you may be thinking of me at this point, but I would like to as this question. What do we define rights to be? is it our job as humans to dictate the way animals live? do we have to build homes, and throw all of our old sheets and pillows out to the wild so animals can sleep on them? What I am trying to say is this, who are we to say what rights animals have in this world?
ReplyDeleteI believe that animals should have cretin rights, but not to the extreme proposed by Allison. Animals should not, by any means, have all the rights of a human. For one reason, animals do not have the same cognitive abilities as a human. How could a creature have the same rights as we do, such as the right to vote, and the right to bare arms? One of the only rights animals should have is one that protects them form cruelty.
ReplyDeleteObviously animals cannot have all the human rights we have. What can they do with it? It's nature that these species eat those species, we can't stop nature! So far, alot of animals already been protected in the reserve areas or zoos. Addition, in order to provide a better medication system for our human society, new research of medicines and studies need to be tested. So obviously we can't test on humans, so what else can we use other than animals. That may sound cruel, but we were created to be the superior specie on earth. So the best way is other than doing researches on animals, we should take care of pets like members of the family and government should punish those who treat them badly.
ReplyDeleteKarli Cribb MWF9am
ReplyDeleteIf you want animals to have more rights then stop eating and using animals. The main cause for the harsh slaughter ways is because America is a HUGE supply and demand country. Also, it is heavily populated. You can't raise livestock with as much love, care, and kindness as people once did. You have to shoot them up with steroids and kill them rapidly in order to feed our FAT country. Also, the heavy population has left little room for ranches and farms.
As for the zoos... It isn't like we are housing millions and billions of animals and treating them unfairly. Trained proffesionals nurse animals and give them all the love and care they need.But the parks and zoos are making profit for it, so it's justified in their eyes.
Is it fair? Depends... Is it fair that the sea lions eat the cute baby penguins and the aligators eat the cute baby puppies? At least they are deafeating the food chain.
Do animals deserve animal rights? To an extent.. But a country cant survive with purely "hippy" morals.
If anything, kill a quarter of our countries' population... Then let the animals run free in their natural habitats and kill them "fairly".
(IM JOKING)
I believe animals should not be abused, but they are animals. They were made for food. I believe that animals should not have the same rights as humans.
ReplyDeleteI think that some of you people are a little overly dramatic about this "issue". Survival of the fittest has been a part of nature since the beginning of time. Animals experience this just as humans do. Animals kill and eat and do what ever it takes to survive just like humans do. the reason why us humans have these "rights" is because we are more superior than the animals. Animals are not aware what is going on around them and do not know the difference between right and wrong. So the fact that we send them through slaughter houses and use them to pull carts are irrelevant. I do not think that animals should have rights because we use them for us humans to live.
ReplyDeleteIt is in my opinion impossible to give animals equal rights. Not just for the obvious inability to speak out against our government, use guns, vote, and any other right that "us" as humans need to be sufficent in America. Everybody has thier own view of what rights are. I guarantee communist countries or religiously fanatical countries have the same idea's of rights as we do. The same thing goes for animals. All around the world animals are used for different reasons. Here in the U.S. dogs are typically for family company, but in some Asian countries they may be used for food. So would you give dogs protection against bieng harvested for food? What about the Asian countries? They just lost a food source. What about cows? In India they are held sacred in some religions, while here they are mearly walking steaks. Shoud we outlaw the killing of them? The U.S. just lost a major food source.
ReplyDeleteI guess what I'm trying to get at is that there is no way to equally give rights to animals. The only thing that we can do is set the "reasonable" standard just as we do for many crimes. For example... Would it be right if a "reasonable" person killed this animal for food, or abused it for not doing its job? In some communities the answer is yes.... but in some no.
-Matt Bailo
There is nothing wrong with our totem pole... where aminals are below humans. God created them for us to have food so we can survive. Mistreatment of animals, like beating, starving, dog fights, and such is very wrong. It's a matter of respect. They may be below us but we need to respect them because they do benefit us in many wasy in our life. We need them just as much as they need us. Their brains are not the same as a human. They will not stand up and protest their position in life, not because they don't ahve a voice but rather that they don't mind. As long as they are provided with everything they need to survive then they are content in all ways. They don't need more rights... they just need to be respected. As humans we should be able to treat them right without having laws that say so.
ReplyDeleteI like that image; it's kind of funny -- "They will not stand up and protest their position in life..." It's actually what comes to my mind when I hear the word "rights," Chelsie.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we should change this to "animals ought to be treated 'humanely'." What do you think? Again, it's a word choice issue for me.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Chelsie. We should respect them and give them what is needed to make them happy. It is wrong to fight them just because we can and they can't say "No". It would be like boxing to the death for us. As for raising them to eat them, we need the food and it is nicer to them to live on a farm and be fed compared to being hunted. I am against animal testing though. It is disrespecting them. Would you like make-up shoved in your eyes to see how it effects you? Or maybe the newest shampoo to make sure it won't burn or hurt the consumers? We eat them because we need to but do we really need to use them for testing that no human would want to go through?
ReplyDelete--Lisa Langanke
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, animals should not be treated differently than us human beings; us people drink, eat and sleep.Animals do the same.Therefore, they should be treated in the same form. (Rajiv)
ReplyDeleteHuman rights and animal rights might seem antithetical. Do animals, particular those that do not have a special status as domestic companions or as 'noble creatures' (such as tigers, lions and elephants) that are hard to kill, have rights? Or do you want to tell me that they have the right to kill humans? I don’t think so. Animals are only capable of expressing themselves indirectly in case of abuse.
ReplyDeleteThe concept of animal rights can be interpreted in widely different ways. On the one hand, some may exercise the right to kill animals for the purpose of consumption or sports. Some people, on the other hand, will deprive themselves of the right to kill even the smallest animal by mistake. They have some rights, but not like human because we are superior to them and they have been created for us.
This is Brittani Earp from the MWF class at 9. I think that women are discriminated against still today. I don't think as much as in the old days because they are actually aloud to work now, become "big shots" in companies, become faces of political figures, and much more. However, I still believe they have to work harder for their positions then men. Look back to the 2008 election. Sarah Palin and Hilary Clinton were talked about so negatively when we had men who had done worst, yet weren't emphasized as much. Women recognition has come a long way, but those women have had to work for it and still have a long way to go before they are looked at as equals to men.
ReplyDelete